The real reason for Global Warming: No one wants to mention

Global Warming is happening, and the more nay sayers speak out against it getting hooter the hotter it gets. So shut up.
Global Warming is mainly caused by people. All of us people. Most of all, us so called Americans, as we consume and waste more than anyone on the planet.
So, what is the real reason for Global Warming? Too many people! The planet is over populated. Now mind you I am in no way advocating we go around killing anyone. No. Not an option. But, an option is, Stop Having Babies!
Here is why:

1. People in the U.S., I'm guessing due to inbreeding, have become stupid and have way too many babies and some do it to live off of welfare.
2. The Catholic church wants you to have lots of babies only to increase its membership and make more money. Bottom Line.
3. Some still think some god decides the matter. If that's so, all the infertile people should enjoy sex without having babies. If it were really up to god, a lazy way of saying I give my control over to an unknown, unseen being and I refuse to be responsible for the out come of my actions, then people would die off at the same rate. Or, in the case of a jealous, vengeful god, he'd kill a few thousand every so often. Stupid people think its not their responsibility and its up to a god, just plain stupid.
   
4. Modern allopathic medicine has allowed the weakest members of our race to live, at all cost, and in essence polluted the gene pool. I come into contact with enough drooling fools everyday that may not have survived if modern medicine hadn't stepped in.
5. The planet can comfortably support only about 2 to 3 billion of us and All the other life forms we share this planet with. That way we all have plenty of room, extinction would be less caused by people, pollution would be much, much less and global warming would less of an issue.

So, the next time someone talks to you about Global Warming ask them: Don't you think if we have less than half as many people we would be worried about Global Warming? See if they will even acknowledge the question and then answer in the affirmative.

It's a bigger issue than currently discussed.

Gardasil - good or bad for you?

My opinion, Bad. Here is why.

People are easily lead and don't think for themselves much anymore and so will take it just because they are told to. How many of you have asked some very important questions like, what are the side effect, can the side effects be worse than not taking the drug, before this drug just how many women really did get cancer from a virus? More on side effects later. For now, why are women just accepting what they are being told?

• I would imaging the virus this drug is attempting to treat has been around as long as women have.
  
• How is it that now the virus has become such an issue? What changed?

If you look at the food people consume, it is very highly processed, lots of processed sugar, wheat, dairy, meat and eggs. By not consuming a wider variety of whole natural foods right from the land, women are not getting the full spectrum of nutrients needed to stay healthy and keep the virus at bay, naturally. Food here is the answer, not a drug, otherwise many more women throughout history would have died from this virus.

Are the side effects worth it? NO. Here is a short list of what you can expect: joint pain similar to arthritis, stuffy nose and sinus problems, vomiting, persistent cough, flu like symptoms or general feeling of being unwell, lack of energy, fever, nausea, pain at the injection site, among others.

So, would you rather change your diet and avoid the drug effects? I would, its a no brainer.

One more question women should be asking themselves, why is this being pushed onto very young girls? Is it because this virus is so dangerous all of a sudden or is it because it helps to increase profits for the pharmaceutical industry?

Think before you just line up and blindly follow the person ahead of you. It just might to your death.

Double duty - more for your buck

I'm just loving the controversy over green fuels. Are they good for us and the environment? Or, are they not? People are so stupid, they'll find controversy in anything, even the sun rising ever day. Why not be more productive and find ways to produce more energy from fewer bio-fuels? Like, oh, I don't know, methane as a secondary fuel after ethanol or biodiesel / bio-diesel as the primary fuel.

If we did things right:

1. Everything would be grown organically and Monsanto along with ADM would be out of business for creating a genetic nightmare, and creating an unsustainable form of agriculture.
   
2. All bio-fuel crops would not take the place of food crops. Food first and then crops for fuel.
3. All bio-fuel crops would do double duty by being used to produce a primary fuel and then thrown into a digester, along with our sewage and animal waste, to produce methane. Double duty and more for you buck. What comes out of the digester would be fertilizer to grow even more crops.

The only reason this isn't happening now, is that people in the U.S. and most other developed countries think in a linear fashion, rather dynamically. Just because a particular fuel-crop has been used to produce one type of fuel does not mean it can not produce methane before it becomes fertilizer.

For those who don't know, methane is natural gas and can be used in much the same way.

So, the next time a bio-fuel initiative is up for public input / vote, make sure you add methane production as a secondary fuel. Make it a requirement , essentially doubling up on the amount of energy extracted from a particular bio-fuel crop.

Be smart. Think how something can do more, not less.

It's good to be back

There's so many things I could have written about, Bush, the Administration, the Economy sinking, not so nice bosses, the enslavement of a nation and much more. Instead, I took time off to just not worry too much about things and take care of myself for a change.

So how's things out there in cyberland? You doing alright, surviving? Hope so, because soon we will all face a different tomorrow.

As oil runs low and prices go up things will change. Where we live will change. How we keep warm or cool. Food will become expensive enough that people will turn their lawns into kitchen gardens. Walking and non-fuel based transportation will become more popular and big name stores will find it hard to stay in business as it will be harder for people to get to them or the malls, instead opting to buy more locally produced goods by smaller businesses.

When I tell people that, they always ask me, "What about hydrogen?" or what about bio-fuels like ethanol or biodiesel? Well, sorry to tell you, none of them are the answer. We are running low on drinkable water. Are you willing to give up your day's worth of water to make hydrogen to fuel someone else's car? As for fuels we can grow, the problems becomes, are you willing to grow food or fuel? If you grow a crop for fuel, it take fuel to grow it, transport it, process it into fuel and then the cycle starts over. With food, you do the work yourself and eat what you grow. Forget large corporate farms, they just aren't sustainable.

So, the future to some will look bleak and to others, it will just mean an adjustment. The real problem is, we just have way too many people and the planet just can not sustain 7 billion people. More than 4 billion will have to die off for the remaining 3 billion to just live after the oil runs out. The planet just does not have enough drinkable water, land to grow food and fuel nor other resources. We have become our own plague, slowly killing ourselves.

The answer, stop having babies. Use less resources, of all kinds. Learn to grown your own food. Learn to trade and barter for things rather than use money. And, just enjoy a slower pace of life. Don't stress about the oil running out, we can't prevent it.

What I know about Telefund

It is not a friendly company. Not toward its employees and certainly not to the people being called.

Telefund is hired by a number of organizations to call people, either current members or not, in an attempt to convince them to give money / donate. Most of the time, these people get called far too often and there is some serious donor fatigue and many of them are not able to give beyond their annual membership because they are either older, poor or students. Call backs that are set mean absolutely nothing as the antiquated computer and software system ignore call back dates and times in the majority of cases as a list is, as they call it, recycled - called again once the end is reached.

As for employees. They often have to be very vigilant of their time or there is a chance of being shorted and if not caught in time, the company cares little to correct the problem. Many times bonuses are listed as 'TBA' which means they can pay whatever they want, or nothing, and because of their team of lawyers, its legal.

If an employee, like myself, figures out how the company can manipulate what they pay someone, they are forced into the lowest pay scale and given most unpleasant list(s) to call, virtually guaranteeing their income to not rise and their performance to go down. I figured this out and managed to raise over $2,500 for an organization in one day, and no one bothered to cheer me on or say well done, as they do to with their favorite pet employees. The following week, one of the people in management decided to move me quickly from one campaign we were calling on to another, lowering my pay to its lowest possible and then threaten me with my job if I did not improve.

Everything I have said here I have personally experienced, and I suspect a good number of former employees have too. I ask only this, if you get a call from Telefund, check your callerId, or ask, by law they should tell you, yourself removed from the calling list. You will also need to call the organization they were calling for, to make sure your name is forever removed the calling list, because Telefund wont do it, they leave it up to the organization and wash their hands of any responsibility if it is not removed.

George W. Bush Resume, posted online

That's right kids, the resume of George W. Bush is online for your reading pleasure. Rather than cut and paste it here, please follow this link: George W. Bush Resume. Enjoy.

SOS indeed

Events like SOS, Live Earth are misguided attempts at doing good. No different than the use of Double Speak to lie to you under a guise of being truthful. So, the word gets out about Global Warming and the need of reducing our Carbon Foot Print. But, what good is it if the event:

• Causes the loss of a whole forest used for fliers, office paper, tickets and more,
• Offsetting the carbon debt is just a white-wash way to pretend the carbon produced is taken care of,
  
• The event is more about making millions of dollars which is not used to plant trees or do anyone but the uncaring already rich any good
• Will people be allowed to bring reusable containers to the concert to hold their drinks or are millions of plastic bottles and cups just going to be thrown out?

Visiting the website doesn't make me want to go. They also mention something about fighting global warming, making adjustments to reduce or offset their carbon debt and yet, its still not enough. I wish people would wake up to the money grubbiness of some people who will do whatever to make sure that you keep them rich under the guise of doing good.

Is this concert really a failure in disguise?

Pondering - Nothing

Yesterday morning I did a good deed without thinking twice about it and then nothing.

You see, this guy got on the bus and he didn't have the fare money and in a kind of automatic reaction, I reached for my small bag of coins, took out the needed fare and handed it to him. I didn't even wait for a thank your or expect one. I tied off my bag, put it away as I handed over the coins and continued talking with my friend. I never thought twice about, I just did it and expected nothing in return. I handed him the money, gave him a quick nod and, nothing. I felt nothing. I thought I was suppose to feel good when I did a good deed, like a cosmic, 'hey, you did a good deed' feeling, but nothing. I didn't necessarily feel good, certainly not bad, just nothing.

Well, at least I didn't feel bad and maybe that's just how it suppose to be - you do a good deed and you move on. That's it, and ..., I'm Ok with that. Nothing, and you move on. Simple. How it should be.